STP COMPLIANCE EHS REGALERT ROUND-UP
April 30th 2025
Warehouse Worker Ergonomics Standard

New Canadian Petroleum Bulk Storage and Loading Regulations
India Revises Waste Battery Rules with a Focus on EPR
Battery producers and dealers can now take advantage of new exemptions and streamlined labelling requirements issued under the Battery Waste Management Amendment Rules, 2025, effective February 24, 2025. The amendment aims to refine and facilitate extended producer responsibility (EPR) requirements applicable to battery producers, dealers, consumers, and entities involved in the collection, segregation, transportation, re-refurbishment and recycling of waste batteries. The Rules apply to all types of batteries regardless of chemistry, shape, volume, weight, material
composition and use. The Amendments make changes to the 2022 labelling requirements presented in Schedule I, including exempting registration number labelling for packaging covered under rule 26 of the Legal Metrology (Packaged Commodities) Rules, 2017, and permitting barcodes or Quick Response (QR) codes displaying their EPR registration number as opposed to worded labelling, as long as the producer enters the electronic information into a list maintained by the Central Pollution Control Board. An exemption is also added from the mandatory chemical symbol markings for cadmium (Cd) and lead (Pb) when Cd concentrations are below 0.002% (20 ppm) and Pb concentrations are below 0.004% (40 ppm).

Malaysia Rolls Out Safety Inspection Certification Program for Industrial Equipment

Released-Based Cleanup Regulations Come to Connecticut
On January 24, Connecticut’s Department of Energy and Environmental Protection (DEEP) published its Release Based Cleanup Regulations (RBCRs), replacing the state’s Transfer Act as the primary remediation site cleanup program. The regulations await Connecticut General Assembly approval and have a proposed effective date of March 1, 2026.
Under Connecticut’s new release-based, risk-based approach, property transfers will no longer trigger mandatory investigations into historical contamination. Instead, investigations will occur at the discretion of the property owner as part of their environmental due diligence. Reviewing historical records that suggest a past release will not, on its own, require reporting. Accordingly, any person who creates or maintains (discovers) a new or newly discovered historical release will be responsible for reporting and remediating the release. This shift brings Connecticut in line
with nearly every other state’s cleanup framework.
The RBCRs retain and recodify existing soil and groundwater standards and add new risk-based cleanup approaches related to the release reporting rules. These approaches prioritize completing release cleanups within a year of occurrence, with set objectives and require site inspections to undergo technical analysis. Releases for which cleanup will take more than a year require reporting and are subject to new risk-based, tiered cleanup alternatives, where less dangerous releases will be subject to less stringent requirements. They include new permits-by-rule that streamline managing polluted soil below buildings and hard surfaces and eliminate the need to excavate when the property is used for commercial or industrial uses.
Additional details on these changes are available on DEEP’s Release-Based Cleanup Program Regulation Development webpage.